Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob Colman's avatar

What it comes down to looks to me like intentionally misleading the market (by not forcefully correcting resellers deliberate or ignorance based untrue marketing. Untrue marketing can not only mean what’s written or spoken about a product it’s also not correcting people’s perceptions based on what they’re led to believe). A wine with this much sulphur in it is a conventional wine, doesn’t matter if it’s “orange” or not.

Expand full comment
Adam Papaphilippopoulos's avatar

I am skeptical, without good empirical evidence, that it is likely - let alone that the likelihood is pretty high - that wines like this will lead drinkers to genuinely natural wine. I'm willing to change my mind if I see the evidence. Do you have any?

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts